Skip to main content
All cases

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Harvard's twin case. Same outcome.

The same week the National Association of the Deaf sued Harvard, they sued MIT for the same problem: thousands of hours of free, public lectures and online courses with no usable captions. MIT made the same arguments — that captioning everything would be burdensome and the content was free, so users couldn't really demand accommodations.

After five years of litigation, MIT signed a 2020 consent decree requiring them to caption all new public-facing online content and remediate the archive on a schedule. Together with the Harvard case, this established the captioning rules for every university, training-content publisher, and B2B SaaS with marketing videos.

Court

District of Massachusetts

Case

National Association of the Deaf v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

3:15-cv-30024

Outcome

Class action consent decree settlement approved July 21, 2020; companion to NAD v. Harvard; MIT required to caption all public-facing online content

What went wrong on the site

Each visual below shows what visitors with disabilities actually experienced.

Failure: Missing captions

No CC

Deaf users get audio dialogue with no captions

Audio and video content had no closed captions — deaf and hard-of-hearing users got no access to the dialogue.

WCAG 1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded)

Sources & documentation

Is your site exposed like Massachusetts's was?

Run a free scan to find out which of these violations exist on your site right now.

Scan my site

All Education cases

See the full education risk landscape

Other cases, top WCAG failures for education, and what to fix first.

More B2C cases